Powered By Blogger

Saturday, November 10, 2018

Like virginity, credibility is hard to get back.


I watch with some amusement as the broadcast media struggles to regain a shred of their former dignity and credibility. For 3 years the media has been the avant-garde of the Trump deference movement and now that Trump tells reporters to basically 'go fuck yourself' at press conferences those pigeons appear to have finally come home to roost. I wonder what deference tastes like?

Emperor Trump

Their shortsightedness saw Trump as a golden ticket for those willing to trade a respectable role in the evolution and maintenance of democracy for celebrity, wealth, and a cute sounding show title like "Flashback Friday, Keeping Them Honest, The Situation Room, and Don't Get Suckered." They have always known that the emperor had no clothes -- he has no intellectual clothes, rationality clothes, honesty clothes -- they knew he was butt naked in all regards except for his thousand dollar suits.


Nonetheless, they lined the roads and heaped respectability on him in the hopes that he would wave his hand and they would profit from his magnanimousness (and in some ways they have). But in addition to the short-term wealth they received, he also through shit on them. I foul shit that stains the soul, honor, and respectability and now all the water in the world doesn't seem to be enough to wash that shit off. As the saying goes "He that lieth down with dogs shall rise up with fleas," and all the celebrity anchors with their made-up faces and nice clothes are scratching the hell out of themselves off-camera.

They wanted to be entertainers and now they are! They wanted their 15 minutes of fame and they got it. They want us to see them as professional journalists -- nope, that ship has sailed. History I suspect will note emphatically the role of the media in America's flirtation with fascism, at which point they will wish their names were a bit less known and that stain a bit less permanent.

Thursday, August 23, 2018

American Decadence: Part 1


The Systematic Devaluation of Life in America

23 August 2018 (11:17 am) 
Prague, Czech Republic


 
Donald Trump on Mollie Tibbetts' Death

Prologue

It has been my long held belief that America has run its course and is now a failing state. An analogy that I think works well is that of the Titanic. There was a period after the iceberg was spotted but before the iceberg was struck where everything appeared fine, however, the tragedy was inevitable. No amount of rudder or reversing of engines could prevent what was about to happen. America is in a similar situation; we live in a time where all seems, at least relatively, normal, but the future is fixed and its tragic fate appears to be unavoidable.

Exploitation of a Tragic Death

One sign of decadence is the devaluation of human life. In this case the devaluation took the form of an old man using the death of a young woman to further his political career and divert attention from his own personal failings. By turning her life and tragic death into political meat for his base, he devalued her life to an extend that rivaled the person who killed her.

 Trump Speaking in Charleston, West Virginia

As for the those at the Charleston, West Virginia palaver that feasted on the meat he threw out to them, they also did their part to devalue her life. The decadence of one man is not enough to threaten America, on the other hand, a decadent political party and a decadent electorate is much more than enough.



A few days before, in the nearby state of Colorado, another tragic story unfolded. In this case an affluent white father had killed is wife and kids. However, to Trump, their lives had less value than Mollie Tibbetts because they were not killed by an immigrant who was in America illegally. The names of Shanann Watts, Bella Watts (age 4), and Celeste Watts (age 3) could not be used to whip a mob into a frenzied chorus of "Build the Wall," because Chris Watts is just too white and just too American.

The Republican party, represented by people like Rick Santorum (on Anderson Cooper), is desperately hoping that they can use the tragic death of a young woman in Idaho to divert attention from the worst, yet most inevitable, president in American history. The debauchery manifest in Trump and his party are revolting to the eye, so they used the untimely death of Mollie Tibbetts, at the hands of an immigrant, to make us look away. I'm sad to say, I think most Americans will look away, which is why I think America's randevu with its iceberg is inevitable.




 





Saturday, April 28, 2018

I’m the Masterpiece Cakeshop baker. Will my freedom be upheld? By Jack Phillips

Taken from the Washington Post web news - 26 Apr. 2018

Jack Phillips is the owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood, Colo.
Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Many people have asked me how I’m feeling as I await the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in my case, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. My answer changes moment by moment because my feelings are a whirlwind. More than anything, though, I wonder if there will be a place in the community for me when the dust settles. Will this big, diverse country of ours still have room for me and the millions of others who share my beliefs about marriage?

To answer Mr. Phillips' question – I sincerely hope not. I hope America will end and never tolerate again the beliefs of Mr. Phillips or those who share his beliefs. American society has fought, long difficult, and divisive struggle against those who feel that they have a religious right to discriminate. While the end is not yet in sight, acceptance and tolerance of those who would discriminate is a dead-end alley and not the way forward.

At times, my concerns are quite specific. I consider whether I’ll ever again get to do the wedding art that I loved. Will I get to see that gleam in a bride’s eye when my cake design captures her vision for the big day?

A: Mr. Phillips desire to see a gleam, regardless of creative skills, will never outweigh the bigotry that is the root most religious beliefs. Cloaking oneself in artistic creativity inspired by god, fails on one very important point – there is no god, which leaves the fountain for such inspiration coming from the worse part of mankind – the desire to divide the world into US vs. THEM. 

Will my shop survive the 40 percent loss of business that we suffered when the government forced us to decide to stop designing wedding cakes? Or will everything that my wife and I worked for be gone?

A: If the past is predictive, prejudice dies hard in America, therefore, there is every reason to believe that the bigotry of Mr. Phillips will survive for quite some time and his shop will remain viable. Fortunately, the bigoted path to financial suggest is a tougher road than it used to be, for which I am grateful.

I also wonder whether the people who have taken an interest in my case truly understand who I am and how I operate. It’s really quite simple: I serve everyone, but I can’t create custom cakes that express messages or celebrate events in conflict with my faith. That is why I told the gentlemen who are suing me that, even though I couldn’t design a custom cake to celebrate their same-sex marriage, I’d be happy to sell them anything else in my shop or create a cake for them for another occasion.

A: I suspect some people who follow Mr. Phillips case understand him for exactly what he is; while many others accept the "I have gay friends" apologetics offered above. The position is little different than the racist who claims to have a black friend or a black employee. Rational people see through such lies with ease and the folksy bigoty offered above provides no cover.

Everyone is welcome in my shop — be it homeless folks (many of whom I’ve befriended over coffee, cookies and conversation), the two men who are suing me, or anyone else who finds their way in. The God that I serve, whose arms are open to all, expects that of me, and it is my joy to obey Him. But creating a cake that celebrates a view of marriage in conflict with my faith is not something that I can do.

A: 'Welcome' is as much a state of mind of the receiver as the one who offers it. Clearly, there are people who Mr. Phillips made feel decidedly unwelcome, and this feeling was part of the original case. Mr. Phillips' belief system lowered them to a status so low and reprehensible that even making a cake for them became an insurmountable moral issue. The god that Mr. Phillips and many others obey, clearly, according to the above statements, is just as bigoted as those who would follow it. This is the nature of every god. Gods are racists when worshiped by racist, they are misogynists when worshiped by misogynists, and they are bigots when worshiped by bigots. God has always been one-size-fits-all, with a moral relativism that none can match.

It is troubling to imagine what the future looks like for me and the millions of others — whether Muslims, Orthodox Jews or fellow Christians — who believe as part of their faith that marriage is the union of a man and a woman. After years of my state telling me that I must hide, ignore or reject that belief, my sense is that we just don’t belong anymore.

A: The future for Mr. Phillips and his millions (or perhaps billions) of fellow bigots, misogynists, and racists, is not as bleak as one might think or as suggested above. There is power in numbers and currently those who prefer to draw upon the worst instincts of our species for their daily guidance should continue to have a pretty good run in America and around the globe.

The government’s hostility toward my beliefs has spread through pockets of my community. My life and the lives of my family have been threatened repeatedly. Last year, one man swore that he’d shoot me in the head, and another threatened to kill me with a machete — all for declining to create a wedding cake. The threats and harassment have been so bad at times that my wife has been too afraid to set foot in our shop.

A: As deplorable as Mr. Phillips' thinking might be, the above threats are unacceptable and reveals that vigilance against our base instincts must never fade because the darkest elements of humans sleep just below the surface and are easily reawakened.

If the Supreme Court rules against me, I fear it will only get worse. The law, I’ve come to learn, not only dictates what you may do, but it also teaches what you ought to do. If the highest court in the land banishes my beliefs from the marketplace, that will embolden others to continue treating me with scorn and contempt.

A: If the court rules against Mr. Phillips I will be both surprised and pleased. I certainly hope it will embolden others to fight against the reign of every version of the despotic gods that have and continue to cripple the progress of our species towards a better world with less discrimination.

That sort of ruling will also exclude people who share my beliefs from certain artistic work and creative professions. I shudder to think what I’d say if my granddaughter one day tells me that she wants to design wedding cakes like I did. I guess I’ll tell her that she must choose between the faith we taught her and the wedding-cake artistry I showed her.

A: That those who praise and worship the worst aspects of our species will be deprived of their artistic license to do so, is of little concern to me. I hope the granddaughter mentioned above does want to design wedding cakes when she grows up – I hope even more that she grows up in a society free of bigots, racists, and misogynists.

But if the court upholds my freedom to serve all people while declining to design cakes that celebrate certain events, that would welcome me back into the community from which I’ve been estranged. Those who are opposing me in court have compared me to racists and argued that I’m deserving of their fate — social marginalization. But a ruling for me would reject all that and declare to the world that my faith is not a scarlet letter.

A: It is a common wish among people like Mr. Phillips, they all seem to want to serve those in their own tribe while being free to discriminate against all those they identify as the "other." Racists want this, misogynists want this, and bigots want this. It is the universal want of many, if not most, of those who continue to worship gods that favor one group of humans over another. Since all gods discriminate, all those who follow god feel, more or less, free to also discriminate as well. There is no scarlet letter for the religions, but there should be one for the religiously motivated bigotry, racism, and misogyny.

We all want to belong. I’m no different. The Supreme Court’s decision in my case will say a lot about the First Amendment. But I sure hope the court makes it clear that I belong, too.

A: I am always amused by those whose are part of the majority religion in America playing the victim card. It just as amusing as when whites complain about how tough it is being white in America, or in particular, when white supremacists complain about how disadvantaged they feel being a white person in a majority white nation. Regardless of the court's decision, it will not exclude Mr. Phillips from America. Mr. Phillips will always be part of America – however, if we are lucky, the court decision might indicate that just like homosexuals buying a wedding cake in his bakery, Mr. Phillips' ideas are not welcome.

Friday, January 26, 2018

Judge Aquilina: Justice Gets a Blackeye

In response to the video below entitled: "Did Judge Aquilina Go Too Far in Her Statement to Nassar."


I think she did go too far -- I would say she provided grounds for appeal. In this case the evidence leaves little doubt about Nassar's guilt, however, the US justice system has, with little hesitation, sent innocent people to prison or sentenced them to death on many occasions. In those cases, an impartial judge is essential to a fair trial.

Aquilina's statements to Nassar indicate that she lacks the objectivity and detachment to judge cases where is the evidence is thin and the only barrier to a politically minded prosecutor convicting and an innocent person with an underpaid public defender is a vigilant judge. While purely objective judges don't exist in reality, the idea and the goal of having highly impartial judges is quintessential to a fair justice system, and I would say she failed that particular test miserably.

With regard to her statement supporting an eye-for-eye system of justice, this further demonstrates a level of bias that we should all find unacceptable.

“Our Constitution does not allow for cruel and unusual punishment. If it did … I would allow some or many people to do to him what he did to others.”

The idea that she needs a constitution to prevent her from imposing cruel and unusual punishment is little different from those who would support torture if the constitution allowed it or if it were legal. The inhumanity of such ideas is not dependant on the constitution or on legality and if the only thing that holds back your worst instincts are words on a piece of paper, then perhaps being a federal judge is not the right occupation.
In response to the YouTube video below entitled "Evangelicals Bending Over Backwards for Trump."



Evangelicals voted for Trump because they prefer authoritarian governments, not democratic governments. It is hard to worship a god without feeling right at home with authoritarianism.

Thursday, January 25, 2018

Being anti-immigration: an inevitable step on the road to fascism.

In response to the YouTube video below entitled "Border Patrol Thinks Dead Mexicans are Hilarious."


Anti-immigrant attitudes, like racism, is just one of the steps along the road to fascism. TYT often acts or sounds surprised that this is happening in America. This has been part of America's evolution for the past 30 years. America's progress along that road has been as predictable as a stopped clock. American nationalism, which is brainwashed into people during public and private education, keeps people from admitting that the America they want is not the America they live in.

Sunday, January 7, 2018

American Neo-Nazi Murderer Not Necessarily an Oxymoron

In response to the video: Neo-Nazi Murderer To Be Tried as Minor



Perhaps he is being tried as a minor, because he is a minor, and of course because he is white, with the latter being the more important variable. The American criminal justice system has never hesitated to try minors as adults if it suits the social need. In 2001, America sentenced a 14-year-old (black kid) to life in prison for a crime that was arguably equally horrible.

The actions of the American Nazi, extreme as they are, are based on an underlying philosophy that is not entirely unpopular with many, many Americans. America could not have possibly advanced this far along the road to fascism if the authoritarianism, so much appreciated by the Nazis, was not an attractive and appealing ideology for lots of people. Politicians routinely build their campaigns around authoritarian buzz words like Law-and-Order and calling protesters and activists, terrorists.

A Law-and-Order Criminal Justice System

Prosecutors, who always have political aspirations, will not piss down the neck of Americans by putting this trial under a public spotlight. As a minor, everything will be sealed and there will be no public conversation about his motivation, or where he got it his inspiration. The last thing a law-and-order society needs is to hear that this kid's murderous thinking was inspired by racism, bigotry, and the nationalism of their leaders and their political parties.

What Happens When the Blindfolded Lady with the Scales is a Racist?

As for the 14-yr-old mentioned above, parading a black child in front of the media as little homicidal animal, fit well with the American narrative of blacks being an inferior and violent race, or as Hillary would say, "super-predators. " Clinton's speech was 3 years before the crime that landed a child in prison for life. I would think that most advanced societies, as America claims to be, would find a better way to handle such a case.

A Side Note: Censorship in America

Regarding the free speech issue brought up in the video, TYT is way off base. They defend the hell out of speech when it is speech they like but quickly ask why Twitter hasn't censored the sites they dislike. This is typical of those mentally trapped within the matrix of the American system, i.e., some censorship is okay and free speech is great unless I disagree with it.

Tribal America

In response to this video



Blood is Thicker Than Water


Humans are biologically clannish and tribal, it is the Achilles heel of our species. America is our tribe, and the news media, consisting mostly of humans, is not going to go against the tribe. The same is true of every American politician. They wear an American flag lapel pin for a reason -- it is flashing the gang colors of America. While tribes, gangs and clans can do awful things, those in the middle, or the matrix, still show allegiance, which is why so many were outraged that Kaepernick took a knee. He took a stand above and outside the tribe.

Tribalism knows no political bounds, both parties and independents are fiercely tribal. While Sanders and Warren have polices I disagree with, I appreciated the fact that they don't wear an American flag lapel pin, which of course, opens them to claims that they are unpatriotic and un-American and not part of the tribe; on the other hand, their campaign rallies, like all others, are drenched in American flags and are wet with nationalism. 


Outcomes of American Tribalism

 It was painful to realize that this story could be equally true if we substituted American for Israeli and Afghanistan for Palestine. Perhaps this is why the US government is sympathetic to occupiers. Birds of a feather ...

 People all over the world pay a price, often the price of life, for the gang affiliation of Americans.

Thursday, January 4, 2018

Law and Order is code for Authoritarisnism

This video below is the basis for my comments. I recommend the video as a chance to see multiple scenes from the inauguration day protests in Washington, DC.


I wish I shared the guarded optimism expressed in the video, but I don't see the days of authoritarian policing coming to an end in America anytime soon. The militarization of the police has been in progress for several decades and has taken place under both Democratic and Republican governments. Reversing it would be a huge task and neither political party sees a political advantage in doing so. On the contrary, both parties find the process to be in line with their ideology.

Both political parties stress "law and order," and use the phrase as code for authoritarianism. As a result, our police forces are now typical of those historically seen in repressive governments. Responses to protests in America (with gas, projectiles, and truncheons) are not unlike what we have seen in Panama, Nicaragua, Columbia, Nigeria, South Africa and what we continue to see today in Iran,  Honduras, and Egypt.

Once we start rounding up our citizens like cattle, democracy is dead.

On 31/12/17, 60 people (students) were arrested at a birthday party in Cartersville, Georgia. More than likely it was a mass arrest (or a mass false arrest) without legitimate cause. It is almost inconceivable that all 60 people presented probable cause for their arrest. Just like it was inconceivable that the 200 or so protesters arrested in Washington, DC, presented probable cause.

The high profile mass detentions in DC, and previously in New York City, offered cover for arrests like the ones in Georgia to continue unabated. The prosecution (read as the US Judiciary) of those who were near an alleged crime has offered the police the legal backing needed to randomly arrest people by assuming "guilt by proximity."

It's clear the police are now acting as a blunt unconstitutional force with the goal of coercion, extortion, and intimidation of Americans, with those having the least power, being the most heavily targeted. Policing changes that have taken place in America are part of the natural political evolution towards authoritarianism that is taking place, not just in America, but around the world.

The rules are changing -- tag, you're a criminal.
And as a criminal, you are subject to continuous control.

Federal, state and local governments are using the executive and legislative branches to criminalize dissent and any behaviors that challenge those in power or challenge the views of those who support those in power. Then they use the police and the judicial branch to make sure citizens constantly feel the boot of authority on their neck as a gentle reminder that conformity is better than a criminal record or prison.

2018: Practice makes perfect.

The US government has become so illegitimate that it has turned its power and resources toward suppressing dissent. It now rounds up its citizens like cattle just to demonstrate its power and procedures to do so. Oddly, most citizens have yet to realize these changes, while some, mainly Republicans and conservatives, have embraced these authoritarian changes as the way to save America. However, those in power know what's coming, and they don't plan to be caught off-guard. They have time to make sure that a government "For the people and by the people," will never happen in America.

Thursday, August 31, 2017

Police Failures: Why are we still surprised?

This video was posted by TYT on 30 Aug 2017. It can fairly be described as another in a long line of "What the hell" videos involving questionable behavior by America's police.



 I'm still amazed that Cenk, a TYT host, and owner, still seems to not understand policing in America.

Every time this happens Cenk acts shocked and then goes on to lecture us on how the police should act. This is America, and in America, this kind of policing has a long history of being okay. Not only is it okay, it condoned at the highest levels.

America is a "Law and Order" society and Americans give the police almost unlimited authority to do whatever they want. We must remember that "Blue Lives Matter" was created as a direct response to a few "silly" people who were upset about the police shooting a lot of unarmed black people. What was America's response to the brutal police tactics? The response was not, "Oh, let's stop shooting black people!" Instead, America's response was to create the Blue Lives Matter and All Lives Matter movements. And that pretty much says it all.

So Cenk, save your breath, the rational don't need your lectures, we already know how the police should behave; as for the irrational, which constitute the vast majority of Americans, they have no intention of changing their minds.

Wednesday, January 4, 2017

Failure of the American Moral Compass

03 Jan 2017
Prague, CZ

Just under 63 million people voted for Trump, which represented about 46% of the electorate. Some basic demographics are shown below.






The 3 figures above show that Trump won the white, male vote and the older (greater than 45 years old) vote. However, it would be a mistake to totally discount the number of younger and female votes he received. The objective here is to understand the implications of his victory when we consider two of Trumps most disturbing campaign statements. Statements that should have resulted in not only failure to win primaries, but certainly a failure to win the election.

The Litmus Test
A litmus test is a simple test used to determine if a substance is an acid or base. The meaning has been extended from the chemistry or biology lab into everyday life to mean a dichotomous test or a pass/fail test. In general use, it refers to a test in which there are only 2 outcomes and depending on which one you pick, you either pass or fail the test.

Human Rights
Americans often think that the US Constitution is the ultimate standard for human rights. However, there are several documents, of human origin, as opposed to some document written by an unsubstantiated god, which are equally or even more decisive in spelling out basic human rights, freedoms, and values. The first is the Human Rights Charter of the United Nations and the second is the Humanist Manifesto (v 3).

Both the aforementioned documents extend the basic human rights in the Bill of Right of the US Constitution. Collectively the three documents represent a comprehensive description of fundamental human rights.

The Moral Compass
The idea of a "moral compass," like the litmus test, is simple and straight forward. It is assumed that if your moral compass is working, it will effectively guide you on moral issues. That is, your moral compass should keep you aligned with the three above-mentioned texts without you having to constantly looks issues up to see where you should stand. A functioning moral compass should automatically align with the texts on human rights, just like a real compass automatically aligns with magnetic north. Since the term "human rights compass" is not in common use, we shall retain the term "moral compass."

Consistent with the three texts mentioned above, torture and extrajudicial murder represent violations of the most basic human rights. I contend that it is uncontroversial that torture, in all forms, is a wholly unacceptable component of the human condition, as is extrajudicial murder carried out by governmental authority. I further contend that even a quasi-functional moral compass should quickly and easily reveal these as horrific, sadistic, and barbaric deviations from the path of basic human rights. Like a corporation, a government does not have a moral compass. The moral nature of a government is an extension of those who administer the government and the citizens of the country.

Trump's Quotes
(1*) Trump, Feb. 17, 2016: "Torture works. OK, folks? You know, I have these guys—”Torture doesn’t work!”—believe me, it works. And waterboarding is your minor form. Some people say it’s not actually torture. Let’s assume it is. But they asked me the question: What do you think of waterboarding? Absolutely fine. But we should go much stronger than waterboarding."
(2) Trump, Dec. 3, 2015: "The other thing with the terrorists is you have to take out their families, when you get these terrorists, you have to take out their families. They care about their lives, don't kid yourself. When they say they don't care about their lives, you have to take out their families,"
The question now becomes: Of the 63 million people who voted for Trump how many were aware of his positions on these 2 issues? A Google search produced 30 million combined hits and a Google video search produced 1.4 million combined hits for the 2 quotes. These numbers, in my opinion, suggest that the average voter would have heard about these 2 positions and most likely would have heard about these positions without having to extensively research for them. Additionally, these 2 positions were in the public domain for at least 9 months, which would have further increased the chances that an average citizen would have encountered these 2 positions. The Google search further revealed that these positions were widely covered my mainstream and alternative media.

In my mind, these 2 positions can be easily evaluated with a litmus test. These are simple pass/fail issues. Both of Trump's statements are total and unequivocal fails. They are completely incompatible with human rights as presented in the previously mentioned documents. As such, they should have been disqualifying statements for anyone with a functioning moral compass. A person with such positions, should not, in theory anyway, have been able to advance in the primary process.

The Flaw of Relativism
Nonetheless, Trump did advance and ultimately, just under, 63 million people, all with a moral compass, failed to correctly interpret the results of this litmus test. It's true that we live in a relativistic world, however, you cannot balance a litmus test by specifying some offsetting position, no matter how appealing. Human rights are not measured on a sliding scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Basic human rights are measured on a pass/fail basis. These 2 failures are like the holocaust. There are infinite fails, and nothing finite (like more jobs or building infrastructure) can be placed on the opposite side of the scale to act as an offset. So, how did so many people fail to recognize this grotesque imbalance? How could so many people fail to see the inhumanity of Trump's positions? How could so many moral compasses have failed to align with the magnetic north of basic human rights?

The election of Trump, while disturbing all by itself, is much more disturbing when you consider that millions of voters, either ignored or were completely failed by what should have been a moral compass shaped by the best of Western values starting with the enlightenment and extending through to today. I have no doubt that the concept of a "moral compass" is as valid now, as ever; however, whether all Americans have a functional compass must now be seriously questioned. At the moment, and considering the number of people (63 million) who voted for Trump, despite, his horribly unenlightened and barbaric positions, it would seem that a significant percentage of the American electorate have a broken moral compass. These individuals would seem to lack the intellectual prowess to recognize the simplest, most obvious violations of human rights. Such an intellectual failure by so many does not bode well for the future of America.

* Trump quote 1 was reported to have been reversed. However, in my judgement, Trump's reversal on this position was not widely recognized or widely know, and I believe that the overwhelming majority of those who voted for Trump were under the belief, although, it may have been a false belief, that he favored torture. This means that the nature of their moral compass is still a valid question.

Sometimes it is nice to recognize the support of a fellow liberal who has written eloquently on the topic. To this end, I would like to suggest that you follow this link and read the work of David Remnick. While I may not fully endorse his assessment of Hillary Clinton, I have no problem endorsing his views regarding the election of Donald Trump. 

Wednesday, December 28, 2016

Police Unions View the Constitution as Optional.

28 DEC 2016
Prague, CZ

Police union demands Amazon to remove 'Bulletproof Black Lives Matter' shirt

The US's largest police union has urged Amazon to remove a T-shirt from its third-party marketplace that says: “Bulletproof: Black Lives Matter”.

The Fraternal Order of Police has already succeeded in having garment removed from Walmart supermarkets. But as of Sunday morning it was still available on Amazon.    
Union president Chuck Canterbury said he didn't expect that to change anytime soon.
Characterising Amazon as a “pretty liberal marketer", he told The Guardian that the T-shirt's rhetoric had inspired violence against members of law enforcement.
According to the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund, 64 police officers have been fatally shot in the line of duty in 2016.
At least 940 people have been killed by a police office across the country over the same period, according to the Washington Post database that tracks police violence.
The constitution of the US has a fairly clear "free speech" clause and there is no better example of the exercise of that clause than wearing a t-shirt that reads "BulletProof."
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

If the largest police union, and the members they represent, is/are unable to understand this clause, then they also fail to understand that free speech is at the foundation of a functional democracy.

This furthers my belief that the US police forces are a force against democracy (in particular democracy for Blacks and other minorities). They have become a quasi-miliatia that protects the rights of the "Haves" and ignores the rights of the "Have nots."

The continued existence of these types of police departments means that they will continue to transition into forces that will participate in the growth of Totalitarianism in America.

Monday, November 28, 2016

Muslim Registry: Americans Will Draw a Line -- Maybe, Someday

28 Nov 2016
Prague, CZ

I was watching a TYT video in which the panelist were discussing the likelihood of there ever being a Muslim Registry. The discussion centered around a news clip of Reince Priebus saying that while a Muslim Registry was NOT and option, nothing was OFF THE TABLE. An amazing sentence, which in fewer characters than a Tweet displays a level of dishonesty that should instantly qualify him to be a presidential candidate in 2020.

The TYT discussion involved some joking at the lunacy of such a registry and then went on to discuss how likely it was to ever happen. There were references to the Japanese registry of WWII and there were suggestions that the American people would never let that happen again. The panelist, under or around 40 years old, may have forgotten that most Americans were born after the Japanese registry happened or were very, very young when it happened. They may have also forgotten that most American K1-12 history books have purged that event from their pages, because they only want to present the warm-fuzzy side of American history. It's a bit like the Texas Board of Education trying to remove slavery from American history or rewriting the relationship between America and Native Americans. God forbid, we ever teach from a textbook that is not PRO-AMERICAN.

But I digress. The panelists, more or less, concluded that Americans would take to the streets in protest of a Muslim registry. They foresaw street protests and non-Muslims flooding the registry as a form of passive resistance. In the end, they all seemed to feel that it just couldn't happen here, again. The operative word is "again."



In response I wrote:

Yeah, the clever Muslims and non-Muslims will flood the registry. Sort of like how the clever Jews and non-Jews flooded the trains to overwhelm the German railroad system. Come on, get real. It may or may not happen, but history shows us that if it does it will take Americans about 5 years to wake up and give a shit, which is why it took Americans from 1950 to 1956 to decide that maybe McCarthyism wasn't such a great idea. Our why it took a decade for Americans to decide that Vietnam wasn't working out.

Americans have a bad habit of being a day late and a dollar short when it comes to really serious issues like this one. Even when you slap 'em and shake 'em with information, they will still stand ideally by and watch, just as they did when America invaded and occupied Afghanistan and Iraq. In general, if an American's stomach is full and the cable is working, they are slow to rouse and even slower to act.

A Muslim registry may never happen, but if the government wants it bad enough, it will happen and it will last for years, just like Guantanamo Bay.

On the bright side, a good registry can be used to register all kinds of things as well as lots of other groups of people, maybe even you.

America is "mowing" the lawn; and the lawn is us.

28 Nov. 2016
Prague, CZ

The North Dakota Pipeline project makes it into the side-stream media every day. For whatever reasons, the story is too insignificant for the main-stream media to touch. Although, for people who think like me, the reason is not so hard to figure out.

However, I was watching a side-stream news outlet that I generally respect only to hear them discuss the story in awkwardly superficial terms. They used the required terms like "water protectors," "Native Americans," and in referring to the goons dressed as police, they were sufficiently disgusted.

Nonetheless, there was something missing. The story was passionless and mechanical, as though, it was just another Goon vs. Protestor story. The kind that have punctuated American history for a hundred years. Most don't recall or have never heard of the GM auto-workers "sit-down" strike in Flint Michigan in 1936. At the time is was GM workers who were protesting and it was GM that called in the thugs, goons and general all-round shitheads to breakup the strike. Like now the police mercenaries were armed with guns and tear gas, but unlike now, when the National Guard was called in by Roosevelt, it was not to shoot the protestors, but to protect them from the police and GM strike busters, or as I call them, blue-collar GM criminals.

It was as though the people telling the story were completely missing the most important message.

America is "mowing" the lawn!

For your consideration, my comment to the video and the video are shown below.
I thought the conversation was a bit superficial since in a very real sense, the US Government declared open combat against the citizens of the United States of America. This was not pushing and shoving, this was warfare by a militarized mercenary police force against unarmed citizens. When Israel does this in Palestine, it's called "mowing the lawn." Wake up America, your government is "mowing the grass" in North Dakota.

Thursday, November 24, 2016

Alt-Nazi

24 Nov 2016
Prague, CZ
I keep hearing how Trump has little or nothing to do with the rise of Neo-Nazism in America. And the speech by Richard Spencer cannot and should not be attributed in any way to Trump. I have no doubt that Trump was not asked to approve the speech nor participate in any way in its writing. However, after reading the whole speech I'm not so sure he wasn't the inspiration behind the speech. Which leaves us to ask, what do we make of a person who inspires Neo-Nazism?
An interesting fact I would like to add, is that Trump's name appears 25 times in the speech by Richard Spencer. In my opinion, that's quite often, for a non-inspirational figure. 

Long Live the Emperor!
Richard B. Spencer · November 21, 2016
Editor's Note: This is the text version of a speech recently given by National Policy Institute President and Radix editor Richard B. Spencer at NPI's Become Who We Are 2016 conference
I don’t think I’m alone in thinking how surreal this all is.
Of course, those of us on the Alt Right always took President-elect Donald J. Trump and his chances seriously. Unlike everyone else, we weren’t surprised, or at least not that surprised. We knew he could win. Many of us thought all along he would win. The mainstream media, or perhaps we should refer to them in the original German—Lugenpresse—never did.
This was the year when random shitlords on Twitter, anonymous podcast hosts, and dissidents working deep within the Beltway Right proved they objectively understood politics better than the “Republican strategists” and “political consultants” snarking at us every night on MSNBC. It’s not just that they are leftists or cucks. It’s not just that many are genuinely stupid. Indeed, one wonders if those people are people at all, or instead soulless Golems, animated by some dark power to repeat whatever talking points John Oliver said the night before.
But even though we always took Trump seriously, there was still a moment of unreality – or perhaps too painfully intense reality – when the state of Pennsylvania was called for Donald Trump, the moment when we knew Kek had smiled upon us, that meme magic was real. And though these terms are used half-jokingly, they represent something truly important--the victory of will. We willed Donald Trump into office, made this dream into reality. If you will it, it is no dream, a quote I’m sure our friends at the Anti-Defamation League know well. And this is only the beginning.
After all, what does it mean, to bring your dreams into reality? Dreams are chaotic and hard to understand. They can be self-contradictory and confusing. But at some level, they represent our deepest yearning, our desire to make the impossible real. As TE Lawrence wrote, we're aren't the dreamers of the Night, whose dreams are mere vanity. We are the “Dreamers of the Day,” those who do not want our visions or even our fantasies to be escapes from reality. We want them to be the reality.
In a culture which offers video games, endless entertainment, drugs, alcohol, porn, sports, and a thousand other distractions to convince us of another reality, we want to cut all of that away. We demand to live in the world we imagine.
Today, there is an effort by the humiliated mainstream, those commissars who are lashing out against us and who are whipping up the mobs outside this very building, to push back against us. Despite winning the election fairly, despite winning in the face of near unanimous opposition from the mainstream media, despite destroying both the Republican and Democratic establishments, there is a concerted push to deny the new president-elect legitimacy. It’s especially amusing considering the indignant whining we heard only two weeks ago about how unconscionable it was that Donald Trump was supposedly going to refuse to accept the election results and how he was going to unleash his supporters into the streets. Really, who can take these people seriously ever again?
In the later part of the campaign, Peter Thiel, one of the few people of wealth and status who endorsed Trump, talked about America as a “normal” country, a country with a functional government not constantly at war with the rest of the world. This was the promise of Trump to many of his supporters. And yet, for the cultural Left and its propagandists in the controlled media, then main argument we here today, if you can call it an argument, is that Trump should not be “normalized.” This of course begs the question--what is normal today?
In the Current Year, late-night comedians don’t tell jokes, but give us lectures on what we should not be allowed to laugh at. Worn-out celebrities like Madonna, who have based their entire lives into transforming themselves into clumsy symbols of sexuality and materialism, claim to be offended by the “indecency” of Donald Trump. Journalists don’t fight for free speech, but lead the charge to restrict it. In the Current Year, the state wars against the nation, rather than protecting it.
What is the state of the world? What is this status quo that our “normal” President, Barack Hussein Obama, the community organizer from Chicago, is now shilling for on his last foreign tour?
Let’s look at what our government does. The bulk of the threats we face, especially the Islamic State or Muslim terrorists operating within our own societies, have been enabled by our own government. Massive armies, huge navies, terrifying weapons which could destroy the whole world over and are subsidized at ruinous cost, are actually used to further policies which make all of us less safe.
In the Europe defended by American armies, refugees who commit horrific crimes are set free, but citizens who criticize them are arrested. Meanwhile, at home, the protection of the borders, the primary--and to some libertarians, the only national security responsibility of the government--is ignored.
Indeed, Western governments go out of their way to seek out the most dysfunctional immigrants possible and relocate them at taxpayer expense. The “non-government” organizations who support this colonization effort are given huge amounts of money to make their own communities worse. Is this “normal?” Would the Founding Fathers who created those “American ideals” we hear so much about think this is ok?

Let’s look at the culture.

In the Current Year, one’s career can be ruined and life destroyed if you express anything other than admiration for a man who wants to cut off his genitals and say he’s a woman.
In the Current Year, we are told the great threat to our democracy is “fake news” – and then hear breathless accounts, backed little no evidence, that Breitbart.com is “White Nationalist.”
In the Current Year, a white who takes pride in his ancestors’ accomplishments is evil, but a white who refuses to accept guilt for his ancestors’ sins is also evil.
In the Current Year, white families work their whole lives to send their children to universities where they will be told how despicable they are.
In the Current Year, the powerful lecture the powerless about how they don’t recognize their own “privilege.”
In the Current Year, a wealthy Jewish celebrity bragging about the “end of white men” is "speaking truth to power.'
In the Current Year, if you are physically strong, you are fragile. Black is beautiful, but whiteness is toxic. Government doesn’t stop crime, but subsidizes it. “White Privilege” is real but race and sex are just constructs. And if facts are too disturbing, you can always retreat into the 'safe space' of box juice, teddy bears, and endless empathy where realty doesn't matter anymore.
Today, neurotics and degenerates are presented to us as heroes. Beauty is openly denigrated as an offense against equality. And we are ruled by a government which, despite confiscating an outrageous amount of our wealth, can’t fulfill its basic responsibilities defending a people and territory.
This is a basic-bitch argument, but the pre-made signs of those leading the protests against Trump, probably some of those outside this building, come from some of the most extreme Communist groups in the country, the most murderous ideological force in history. It feels almost embarrassing to make this argument, because we know no one will take it seriously. Yet this very day breathless editorials screech that random Internet comments on websites the mainstream media don’t like mean Donald Trump shouldn’t appoint this or that person to his staff.
We need to remind ourselves of these things. None of this is natural. None of this is “normal.” This is a sick, disgusting, society, run by the corrupt, defended by hysterics, drunk on self-hatred and degeneracy. We invade the world and frantically invite entire populations who despise us. We subsidize people and institutions who make our lives worse just by the sheer fact of their existence. We run up deficits and pretend the laws of history simply don’t apply to us because of “American Exceptionalism.”
This cannot go on any longer. And it won’t.
At some level, we demand the impossible. Even those half-joking memes about Donald Trump as God-Emperor or as the progenitor of some glorious Imperium testify to the yearning for something more. Yes, we should insist on our dreams – on the conquest of space, on the development of revolutionary technology, for a humanity that is greater than we are today, for a race that travels forever on the upward path.
But at another level, what we want is something normal, something almost prosaic maybe even boring.
Why is something as simple as starting a family, owning a house, and leaving a legacy to your children seen as an almost impossible dream for so many Americans? Why must there be two incomes for a family simply to break even? Why is it impossible to build a real civic society because the whim of a federal bureaucrat or a Social Justice Warrior can impose Section 8 housing, refugee resettlement, or some other population transfer scheme deliberately designed to break apart functional white communities?
Why do institutions of higher learning turn out graduates who are personally and emotionally broken, as well as ignorant? Even those who can build something in this environment spend the money they earn to isolate themselves from all that vibrancy they feel the need to defend publicly.
It’s not just that this society makes it impossible for us collectively to accomplish great things. It’s that collectively, we can’t even accomplish small things anymore. We take for granted our culture is filth, that the mass transit won’t work, that the cities are rotted out from within, that the great art and architecture of the West has all essentially been made. We collectively know that our country’s best days are behind it.
That was the ur-myth that animated the Trump campaign. To say “Make America Great Again” is both radically pessimistic and boyishly optimistic at the same time. It is an admission America is not what it once was, that it is no longer that nation capable of achieving what it once did. Even liberals at some level know this, as they occasionally pay wistful tributes to the early 1960s America of the moon race and the middle class lifestyle, while conveniently forgetting that American society was 90% white at the time.
Yet MAGA is also forward looking. This idea that we can do this, that America can be what it was, that this idealized past can be restored. More than that, that it can reach new heights, be “greater than ever before,” as President-elect Trump put it. We’re going to win so much, we’re going to get tired of it. This is the new “normal” we are promised, an America of greatness, but also of functional communities and the possibility of a satisfying life for ordinary people.
Contrast MAGA with Marco Rubio's "For a New American Century," literally cribbed from the neocon think tank that planned the Iraq war. Contrast this with Hillary Clinton’s poll-tested “Stronger Together.” What does this even mean? Her coalition was made up of mutually hostile tribes, only united because of their hatred for what Peter Brimelow called the “historic American nation,” which is to say, us.
In the last week of the campaign, Trump was hosting several rallies a day, including one near here in Northern Virginia. A friend who was there told me he was several hours late but no one wanted to leave. But it became so late that small children – there were many families at these rallies – started falling asleep. Parents actually put coats on the ground to form a kind of bed for the children to sleep, and surrounded them to guard the sleeping youngsters. There was this kind of effortless high-trust environment you saw at these rallies, an entire people awakening to their own existence – and realizing not just that they exist and have an identity, but that they are strong.
Contrast that to the Hillary constituency. The black political machines and the guilt ridden liberal suburbanites who work their entire lives to move away from them. The left wing activists who think they are fighting the System by working for the federal government. The multinational CEO’s and the Latinos they’ve imported to clean their houses and cut their lawns. “Stronger together?” There are no two parts of this coalition who could even be in the same room together for any length of time.
And this contradiction goes to the heart of the Left. The Left couldn’t decide this year whether America was already great or whether it was never great. Is America some noble multiracial experiment that belongs to everyone and to no one, or is it the product of conquest and settlement by mean ol' racist Europeans?
Is it a beacon of hope to the rest of the world or an enemy to be destroyed? Because, as the outgoing President would say, let’s be “clear” – despite these supposedly egalitarian “values,” America was, until this past generation, a White country, designed for ourselves and our posterity.
It is our creation, it is our inheritance, and it belongs to us.
The Alt Right is not just an alternative to the moribund “conservative movement,” that Beltway Right of direct mail scam artists and shills whose eternal “values” constantly trail the Left’s vanguard by a dozen years. It’s an alternative to a whole system of lies.
What are we fighting for is a “new normal,” a moral consensus we insist upon.
Donald Trump is a step towards this new normal. But even he is deeply compromised by the perversions that define this decadent society. Donald Trump warred against segregated establishments. He supports affirmative action, or put more bluntly, state-sponsored discrimination against whites. He will be perhaps the most pro-Zionist president ever put into office, turning a blind eye to continued Jewish settlement in the Palestinian territories. He opposes the Iran nuclear deal, which, we should admit, isn't exactly that bad. He has, let us remember, left the door open for some kind of amnesty at some future date, talking about keeping “the good ones” in the country.
The hysteria surrounding his election doesn’t show that he is extreme, but it shows how unhinged the press and the chattering classes have become. We are told of a massive rush of hate crimes against nonwhites by evil racists emboldened by Trump’s victory. Amazingly, these crimes never seen to be captured on video. That violence which does exist seems to consist of direct physical attacks against Trump supporters. And even when this is captured on video, CNN political commentator and former press secretary for Bernie Sanders can smirk, “oh my goodness, poor white people.”
What we see is that the liberal hegemony which governs this society will not permit any reform, even the kinds of moderate reforms which could salvage the whole System. The undercurrent of almost all press coverage in the days since Trump’s ascendency is that white people should not be permitted to vote. What’s more, the news should be censored to ensure that people are only given the “correct” viewpoints.
Far from reflecting on why they lost or extending even a modicum of empathy towards European-Americans, the press has clearly decided to double down and wage war against both the legitimacy of Trump and the continued existence of White America.
But they are really opening the door for us.
You can imagine, hypothetically, some situation where a President Trump or whoever slaps some ramshackle America together and it limps along for a few more decades . . . where the boot is lifted off the neck of white America just long enough to keep the whole thing going. Yet the Left can’t permit that. Environmentalism, workers’ rights, income inequality, mass transit, whatever stated values it supposedly has are thrown out in order to pursue a remarkably crude and simplistic anti-white hatred that is driving it all.
And even more than during the election itself, the mask has been ripped off since Trump’s election. SJW’s always project and the American Left is driven by anti-white hatred – full stop. It has no other goals, no aspirations, nothing to look to. It is a nullity. And we have nothing in common with these people.
It is different for us. Race is real ... but in some sense, whiteness really is a social construct. Think of the concepts that are now designated “problematic” and associated with whiteness -- power, strength, beauty, agency, accomplishment. Whites do and other groups don’t. In the banality of normal life and in our most outlandish dreams, in both our Narrative and theirs, to be white is to be a striver, a crusader, an explorer and a conqueror. We build, we produce, we go upward.
And we recognize the central lie of American race relations. We don’t exploit other groups. We don’t gain anything from their presence. They need us, and not the other way around.
Whiteness, or, rather, identity, is being forced on the deracinated, consumerist Last Man that was the European-American. No one is going to be permitted to escape this process. Great historical changes are imminent when people are forced into a binary choice – fight or flee, join or die, resist … or cuck.
That is the position of white people. Two weeks ago, I might the have said the election of Donald Trump would actually lessen the pressure on white Americans. But today it’s clear his election is only intensifying the storm of hatred and hysteria being directed against us.
As Europeans, we are, uniquely, at the center of history. We are, as Hegel recognized, the concept of world history. No one will honor us for losing gracefully. No one mourns the great crimes committed against us. For us, it is conquer or die. This is a unique burden for the white man, that our fate is entirely in our hands. And it is appropriate because within us, within the very blood in our veins as children of the sun lies the potential for greatness.
That is the great struggle we are called to. We were not meant to live in shame and weakness and disgrace. We were not meant to beg for moral validation from some of the most despicable creatures to pollute the soil of this planet. We were meant to overcome--overcome all of it. Because that’s natural for us.
Because for us, as Europeans, it’s only normal again, when we are great again.
Hail Trump. Hail our people. Hail victory.